Art Review Example \u2013 A Good Gift to Deal With Your Own Paper<\/h2>\n
There is nothing more boring than a poor art review example. An art article written on the artist\u2019s work with the sole purpose of telling about his or her merits is a sure way to scare off the reader. Such gifted writers have proper language skills, but alas, it is impossible to stay interested in reading their works.<\/p>\n
No less evil are the articles imbued with caustic criticism, expressing the author\u2019s subjective opinion about the picture, which is presented like professional and scientific opinion, but in fact reflects the weakness of the critic \u2013 for example, the critic admits nothing but realism in a painting. It is useful to remind these authors who write about artists\u2019 works: \u201cI see the picture and I think I understand the idea, but I can not say anything intelligible in an understandable form.\u201d For this case, we present different types of reviews \u2013 as an example, an art exhibition review example. We very much hope that by taking them into consideration, you will be able to write your articles without further difficulty, and they will be useful, objective, and interesting.<\/p>\n
How to Write an Art Review<\/h2>\n
\n
Never find fault with work. That is, do not build your article on the hooks which a picture gives you, or even worse \u2013 the name of the picture. One bonds, for example, to the word \u201cthunderstorm,\u201d so the whole article is not about painting, but about weather phenomena. Or, there is a picture where the artist depicted a herd of rams in the form of a dollar sign. What a great idea! And all commentators immediately begin to develop the theme of modern business \u2013 there is something to find fault with in this world! However, the idea is good for the artist, but not for the critic who decides to write about this picture. Do not get attached to his or her idea \u2013 you must find your own! Do not start the article until you have your own idea about which you would like to tell the world, but leave also something for the work of the artist. As soon as you put aside possible clues, you will make a real discovery. This is the most powerful critical method \u2013 to press away the nagging clues. You can see this method if you read though any of our art gallery review examples.<\/li>\n
Hooks are different. For example, you want to talk about your life experience in connection with what you saw in the picture, or you want to link some logical scheme or philosophy with the picture. Very often there are clues when a critic wants to correct something in the picture itself, and they would say: \u201cNot red, but a green color would suit here,\u201d and so on. There are also lovers of certain artists, and they are building their article on the fact that they put this artist next to, for example, Salvador Dali, and they say, \u201che had giraffes, but this one had rams.\u201d The depth of such criticism deserves a \u201csuperficial\u201d characterization. And there are reviewers who immediately fall in love with the picture and cling to their emotions, and begin to tell how they anticipate the onset of a thunderstorm. These include people who constantly seem to say their favorite phrase: \u201cIt seems to me that the artist wanted to show \u2026\u201d And some allow themselves to get carried away: they saw a ram in the picture, and now all of their thoughts are about goats and rams. A variety of clues attack the author\u2019s consciousness, but you have to learn how to beat them. Do not cling! Do not embroider your mental patterns into the picture, which will act as a red thread through the entire text of the article. The thoughts of the critic must not cling to anything \u2013 it must be independent and build a story, using the picture as an illustrative material. You can learn how to do it if you read through any example of a good art review presented on our site.<\/li>\n
Always remember the form. When you write on a picture, you should use the form of a review, that is, your article should consist of five paragraphs. The first point is to give an actual description of the picture, in a nutshell, to repeat what is really depicted on it, with a special emphasis on those points that particularly attracted your attention. For example: \u201cA clear green triangle in the foreground of the picture is the first thing I saw.\u201d The second point is to sort through all the thoughts and associations that can come to mind in connection with the picture. For example: \u201cA herd of sheep in the form of a dollar, apparently, hints at the dullness of modern business.\u201d The third point is to give voice to all the feelings that the picture causes or can cause. \u201cHere\u2019s a picture I would hang on my wall! It\u2019s really a good one!\u201d The fourth point is to develop your own idea, which emerged after you thoroughly experienced the picture and did points one to three. Moreover, you can shorten descriptions on the three points, but in any case they need to be done mentally, and then the idea, which you did not have in the beginning, comes as if by magic, and the article changes and ceases to be strained. In the fourth paragraph, you can fully develop your intellectual potential. It is also possible to advertise your own creativity, project, ideological trend, or enterprise. The fifth point is to evaluate the artist\u2019s work or his or her piece of work. For example, you can put at the end of the article such a lengthy phrase: \u201cI\u2019m sincerely glad that in the modern painting such amazing works began to appear that overcame the one-sided expressiveness of postmodernism and brought us back to the world of reality.\u201d A pair of art history terms will not hurt. If you don\u2019t know how to use these terms correctly, you can read our samples \u2013 for example, an art show review example.<\/li>\n
In the article, use the images presented in the picture. The imagery of the language is an actual requirement for all articles on the internet, from which they greatly benefit against the background of universal linguistic stinginess. The image helps to get used to the material, and as for the articles on works of art, they should be doubly imaginative. The first visual image in your article should demonstrate the work of art in the form of a picture, and then try to use in the text those figurative expressions that support the first image. Use more often adjectives like \u201cred,\u201d \u201cblack,\u201d \u201cwhite,\u201d and \u201cblue\u201d if these colors occur in the picture. Operate with the objects depicted in the picture. For example, you can use these words: \u201c\u2026 an endless desert, thickening darkness, a thick layer of clouds, and feathered grass and weeds.\u201d What gives you this right? Of course, if there was not a picture that prompts comparisons, then all of them would be superfluous, inconclusive, and weak. But since there is such a talented and eloquent picture, the text under it will be superfluous, unconvincing, and weak if I do not use them. Take this into account. Also, you need to take into account using any art review example on our site that can help you to write your own review.<\/li>\n
Be positive. Look for essential, worthy, cognitive things in each work. Many people pass by the paintings in museums and exhibitions, not noticing anything significant in them, and they treat the works of contemporary painting as if in them there could be nothing valuable and positive at all. How can you see these valuable and positive things in a work of art and tell about it in the article? It is necessary to perceive a work regardless of whether it is recognized or not and whoever created it: a great artist or a beginner. There is one way to see what others do not see. Imagine that the picture which you are reviewing is given to you for self-knowledge, so that you personally have learned something from it. Refrain from all the negative and confusing moments and try to behold the precious and vital impression that you have experienced through this picture. And now tell everyone what you have learned \u2013 let others see it. That is, write in your article not about the old knowledge gained at the university, but about what the chosen picture has now taught you. And then it will be a vivid positive knowledge, like in our samples. For example, you can read an art exhibition review example to learn how to write vividly.<\/li>\n
Be informative. Your expert knowledge of the painting in any case should not be wasted. But do not paste too much factual data into the text. For example, speaking of the artist\u2019s productivity, mention that the Norwegian artist Edward Munch had 20,000 works. However, remember that the actual information, such as where the artist was born, can not constitute the subject of the article; it only gives it an informative journalistic character.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Art Masterpieces for Your\u00a0Art Review Example<\/h2>\n
It is impossible to imagine the present world without art. It is not just a simple decoration, but a significant source of inspiration, realization of our spiritual experiences, and creative ideas. Each of us has our own preferences and tastes in art. That is why, if your task is to assess a piece of art, for example a painting, you should follow your intuition and select the one that will speak directly to your heart. You do not need to hurry with your choice. You have to spend some time attending art galleries and museums. The success of your research will depend on your decision. To help you with this task, we have prepared a list of possible topics that you may use for your research. It covers both the art masterpieces of historic times and relatively new paintings. We hope that you will make the right choice and succeed with your paper.<\/p>\n
\n
Starry Night<\/em> by Vincent van Gogh<\/li>\n
The Last Supper<\/em> by Leonardo da Vinci<\/li>\n
The Ninth Wave<\/em> by Ivan Aivazovsky<\/li>\n
The Birth of Venus<\/em> by Sandro Botticelli<\/li>\n
The Tower of Babel<\/em> by Pieter Brueghel the Elder<\/li>\n
Boy Bitten by a Lizard<\/em> by Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio<\/li>\n
Self-Portrait<\/em> by Albrecht D\u00fcrer<\/li>\n
Woman with a Parasol<\/em> by Claude Monet<\/li>\n
Lady Lilith<\/em> by Dante Gabriel Rossetti<\/li>\n
Girl with a Pearl Earring<\/em> by Jan Vermeer<\/li>\n
Luncheon of the Boating Party<\/em> by Pierre Auguste Renoir<\/li>\n
The Creation of Adam<\/em> by Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni<\/li>\n
The Dream<\/em> by Pablo Picasso<\/li>\n
The Scream<\/em> by Edward Munich<\/li>\n
Vitruvian Man<\/em> by Leonardo da Vinci<\/li>\n
Young Hare<\/em> by Albrecht D\u00fcrer<\/li>\n
The Temptation of St. Anthony<\/em> by Hieronymus Bosch<\/li>\n
The Triumph of Death<\/em> by Pieter Bruegel the Elder<\/li>\n
St. George and the Dragon<\/em> by Paolo Uccello<\/li>\n
Guernica<\/em> by Pablo Picasso<\/li>\n
The Persistence of Memory<\/em> by Salvador Dali<\/li>\n
A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte<\/em> by Georges Seurat<\/li>\n
Arrangement in Grey and Black: The Artist\u2019s Mother<\/em> by James McNeill Whistler<\/li>\n
Portrait de L\u2019artiste Sans Barbe<\/em> by Vincent van Gogh<\/li>\n
The Night Watch<\/em> by Rembrandt<\/li>\n
The Kiss<\/em> by Gustav Klimt<\/li>\n
Water Lilies<\/em> by Claude Monet<\/li>\n
The Flower Carrier<\/em> by Diego Rivera<\/li>\n
American Gothic<\/em> by Grant Wood<\/li>\n
The Son of Man<\/em> by Rene Magritte<\/li>\n
No. 5, 1948<\/em> by Jackson Pollock<\/li>\n
The Arnolfini Wedding<\/em> by Jan van Eyck<\/li>\n
Composition 8<\/em> by Vasily Kandinsky<\/li>\n
The Third of May 1808<\/em> by Francisco Goya<\/li>\n
Campbell\u2019s Soup Cans<\/em> by Andy Warhol<\/li>\n
A Day In The Forest<\/em> by Igal Fedida<\/li>\n
Painted Forest<\/em> by Theo Ramone<\/li>\n
Coming Home<\/em> by David Hatton<\/li>\n
The City<\/em> by Mark W Stevens<\/li>\n
Temporal<\/em> by Miya Ando<\/li>\n
Meteora<\/em> by Elly Potamianos<\/li>\n
The Hague<\/em> by Monica Hulsing<\/li>\n
Reflective Mood<\/em> by Cassandra Allsworth<\/li>\n
La Luna and Poppies<\/em> by Laurie Maves<\/li>\n
A Lamp<\/em> by Shea Holliman<\/li>\n
Even Silence Speaks<\/em> by Susan Elliot<\/li>\n
Eight Elvises<\/em> by Andy Warhol<\/li>\n
Massacre of the Innocents<\/em> by Peter Paul Rubens<\/li>\n
Triptych, 1976<\/em> by Francis Bacon<\/li>\n
Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer II<\/em> by Gustav Klimt<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n